pe.ma Pema Hegan's collection of news and ideas too long for a tweet

16Jul/090

Work in marketing?

Work in marketing? Don't have a social media strategy (or have one that could be improved)? Have a flick through this...

(from the team at espresso)

14Mar/081

“Marketing is the price you pay for being unremarkable”

crap_billboard

Quote from Robert Stephens, founder of the Geek Squad - via Carsonified.

I've read this quote before, but it hit home this morning having just gone through a big PR push for GigPark.

I chose to interpret the quote like this: Rather than spending a lot of money on marketing, it's always better to spend your time and money building a remarkable product/company that people want to talk about and journalists want to write about.

I still believe that PR/marketing/advertising experts can be an incredible resource to help you spread the word, but they shouldn't be used to drum up interest in a product or company that isn't, in some way, remarkable.

26Jan/080

Social startups need Facebook applications

The GigPark team launched our Facebook application yesterday. The app is completely integrated into our main site so it took some work. Launch was definitively a proud moment!

The GigPark app lets you ask all of your Facebook friends for a recommendation, let's say you are looking for a plumber, and see all of their replies. The app is not invite only, like the main site, so please feel free to add it here.

So, why build a Facebook application when GigPark is only a few months old?

Two reasons:

  1. Services like ours, that get better when more of your friends are involved, need to offer their service where your friends hang out - i.e. Facebook!
  2. Short of a miracle, there is no faster way to grow

For us, Facebook is one of a few important places GigPark should be available. Since GigPark is all about finding services with the help your friends, we need to be where friends communicate. Facebook is definitely one of those places but there will be more in the future.

I believe being platform agnostic is the name of the game. Startups should see themselves as services that people can use wherever they like: On a website, within their favorite social network, through IM, on their mobile phone ... . This is especially true for social startups.

There was a good quote from James Hong of Hot or Not about this on TechCruch last year:

"I have really stopped thinking of Hot or Not as a destination site and worry about how many people are using our service no matter where they are ... People will go where they will go. The world is evolving."

27Sep/072

Free wifi at all Starbucks stores tomorrow…

...all Starbucks stores in the UK that is.

Isn't free wifi a no-brainer for the marketing department of a coffee chain? Hell, I'd even go to Coffee Time if I could get online for free there!

Photo by Russell Davies 

4Jun/075

2012 Olympic logo

London unveiled their 2012 Olympic logo today. Brutal. Just brutal.

UPDATE: It seems that 32,000 Brits agree, that Wolff Olins could have done a better job with the logo.

2May/071

Marketing democracy on YouTube

Having spent 7 years working in advertising agencies I can attest to the fact that the ad business has a pretty warped concept of what the 'truth' is. Agencies don't often lie, they just choose to focus on points that mislead people about the products they are selling. Of course good advertising (the kind that I produced ;)) never bullshits anyone, but unfortunately good advertising is not the majority of what gets produced.

I have always been a big fan of work from citizens or groups that aim to talk back to brands in public spaces and attempt to set the record straight. Adbusters call it subvertising, but usually it just involves someone climbing up on a billboard and changing the text or image on an ad to make a statement.

Unfortunately changing a billboard takes a lot of effort and the threat of going to jail or getting a hefty fine puts people off.

One way I'm increasingly seeing people talking back to brands is on YouTube. Lately I've noticed more people using advertising spoofs, which have been going on for a long time, to make statements and sometimes present some truth about what is being advertised in the original ad. Subvertising on YouTube is less work than a billboard, less dangerous and if you do a good job you have the opportunity to reach many more people.

Here is a simple example of an ad for an energy company in New Zealand being jammed with some 'truth'.

The original ad:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hw8QJWdC650]

The 'fixed' ad:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i12qJ-Nejgk]

17Apr/072

Avoiding the hype cycle

Startups and hype seem to go together like women in Vancouver and yoga pants - they're inseparable.

Women might need pants, but my question is do startups really need tech hype? Do they always benefit from it?

Valleywag re-posted their hype cycle chart today...

This kind of technology hype is obviously important for companies targeting the web2.0 crowd. It will make or break brands like twitter, Joost and Justin.tv. But for companies with a different target why not stick to the tried and tested model: identify your audience and approach them with a compelling proposition and a solid product.

Sometimes I think startups are too quick to target the tech media, hoping for coverage and, well, hype. Maybe they think this is the only way? The classic marketer in me would ask: If your target audience isn't reading TechCrunch then why do you need a story from them so badly? Do you really need all of the visitors that will come from an appearance on the front page of Digg if they're not the type of customer that will stick around and make your business a success?

Of course all businesses have several target audiences, and one that IS reading the tech media are investors. So maybe my point is that there is a time for tech hype - and that some startups can get ahead of themselves. Let's see if I still agree with that in 9 months when I have been through a bit of a hype cycle myself ;).

3Apr/073

Well, I wouldn’t use it.

When I joined my first advertising agency at the tender at of 18 I was given some great advice that has guided me through many situations in my career. It came from a seasoned copywriter named Carl. He said the definition of a professional in the advertising business is someone who can reach beyond the kinds of people they are familiar with and create ads that appeal to people that they would never normally come into contact with in their daily lives.

Carl said that when he first started out he wrote great ads for young men and lousy ads aimed at anyone else. The day he realized he'd become a good copywriter was the day he wrote a great ad aimed at teenage girls in the morning and a great one for dentures in the afternoon.

I think this is a fundamental insight into business. Just like creating ads, you become good at creating products when you can create something compelling for people who aren't like you. I spent 4 years working as an Account Planner in London and this was something I needed to remind myself of every day. I had to stretch myself to get inside the heads of different types of people and understand how they see the world and why they make certain decisions. It's a great exercise.

The other implication applies to when you are assessing the merits of something.

When I explain our business, GigPark, to people the first reaction I usually get is either:

  1. Cool, I'd use that. I think you've got a great business there. Or sometimes...
  2. Hmmm, I'm not sure I'd use that. I don't think you have a business.

This is a completely natural reaction for most people. What surprises me though is how many people who's job it is to asses the merits of a business react this way. Surely, these people would be better served by assessing which groups a product might be targeted at, understanding what motivates them and deducing how they might react. Will a person planning their wedding use the product, or a couple who have recently moved into a new neighborhood?

Having said that it is always the job of the person presenting an idea to make the audience do as little work as possible. If I'm explaining a concept and someone can't easily understand who the product would appeal to and why, then that is my fault, not theirs. I'll keep practicing!

28Mar/070

Sutori: Blast Radius goes to work for customers as well as clients

I was finally introduced to Sutori this week by a friend that works at Blast Radius, a digital agency with Canadian offices in Vancouver and Toronto. Sutori is a site that lets people rate products they buy and encourages corporations to participate and react to the feedback.

Sutori in their own words:

We believe that today's customers have more power than ever. Power to make informed choices. To connect with each other and share unbiased advice, opinions and stories.

We've created Sutori to channel that power. To capture the stories that bind us all together in our shared lives as customers. And to make it easy for companies to listen to and learn from those stories.

Sutori was created by a small team at Blast Radius, and from what I can gather it was built on company time. I've always respected Blast from a distance for their commitment to innovation, good management and honesty. I've lost count how many times I've been told stories by current and past employees about how great their policies are and what a good working environment they have created. In fact, when I was editor at Dose magazine we wrote a story about what a great place Blast is to work.

But Sutori looks like a cool initiative even for a company like Blast.

The idea that the world is a different place now and that customers can talk back to corporations seems to be, unfortunately, still a pretty novel concept in the advertising world. Blast have obviously come to terms with this and have decided to create a dialog not just between their clients and customers, but between anyone and any corporation who will listen.

I hope that Blast are encouraging their clients to participate to Sutori: to listen to what customers like and what they don't like about their products, and to react accordingly. I think that this will not only be the key to success for Blast's clients, but also the key for Sutori. Sutori needs to be a place for customers to organize their opinions and then get corporations to listen, not just a place to complain. If they can achieve this then I think Sutori will gain momentum and become a valuable tool for all of us and all of the corporations who market to us.

I wish them the best of luck.

Appendix (can a blog post have an appendix?):

From Sutori's FAQs here is a bit more info about them:

What is Sutori?

On Sutori, you can rate companies by posting stories about your experiences with them.

Each story is accompanied by a "goodwill rating", which contributes to the goodwill meter—an aggregated view of how the Sutori community feels about each company.

When other users read your story, they have the option of leaving a comment or voting to agree or disagree with you.

To reflect the power of consensus, stories with many "agree" votes have a stronger impact on the goodwill meter. Similarly, stories with many "disagree" votes have less of an impact.

In addition to a centralized goodwill meter where companies can track how customers feel about them and why, Sutori also includes a mechanism whereby companies can post official responses to any story.

You can also check out the Sutori blog here.

26Feb/070

Send this to your HR director

Flicked through the job listings in your local paper or on Monster.com lately? They're almost always uninspiring, visually boring and just completely lame.

Which makes it even more cool when you see a recruitment campaign that doesn't suck. Check out this listing for the editor of a small Virginia newspaper (thanks to Mathew Ingram for the link). They got staff, critics and readers involved and presented the whole thing in a nice little web package. More than anything the site tells applicants about the culture of the paper and the passion of the staff. I'm sure they'll get some great applicants.